Update

Got rid of a plugin, so an  earlier post looks differently that it did originally. Now I’m going to rant.

Being Disappointed

We have a talent for misinterpreting things. Very often it’s because we want things to be a certain way. Such as with the purported non-existence of Bigfoot. One subject where we have this need to misinterpret is in the area of post modernism, which we take to an unseemly extreme.

At the core post modernism tells us that we can’t really know anything absolutely. You get right down to it, there’s always the possibility that we are wrong. But that does not mean that everything we expound is of equal value. The theory of evolution works better than intelligent design thanks to the available evidence. Forensics works better than eyewitness testimony, because forensics consists of the inanimate, which has no ego to warp observation.

But that doesn’t mean you can’t come close. Neither does it mean that just anything will work, for somethings do work better than others.You can’t, for example, fly a lead airplane. Lead is just too damn dense. Neither can you shape reality through your desire without the use of physical tools. The mechanism just isn’t there.

We are limited in what we can know, and in how accurate that knowledge can be. But we can still know to a fair amount of accuracy, so long as we accept our limitations. You get right down to it, everything we know is a guess, and some guesses aint worth a rotting wooden nickel. But we can test our guesses, prove or disprove them, and should they be disproved trash the mistake and try something else. There is no sin in being wrong, only in refusing to accept that you are wrong. And it is through correcting our mistakes whenever we spot them that we make progress.

Our world is as it is and all your blathering aint changing a thing.

Playing Around

And Why Exactly?

[row cols_nr=”2″][col size=”6″]

Because I’m trying out a new plugin, which doesn’t look like it was written by a competent coder. For text columns you need to use CSS, and not HTML. But HTML is traditional, and young adults are so damn conservative in so many ways.

It’s the 21st century, time to update.

[/col][col size=”6″]

Content

[/col][/row]

My Thinking

This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series On DJ

But first please note that what follows is how I see things, you don’t have to agree with me.

Dangerous Journeys

Preface

This is a set of mechanics. Not for a game but for a guide. For I don’t see these as games, but as guides. Guides to adventure so I call them adventure guides. I know, so I’ll explain what I’m talking about as best as I can.

Here a guide is a set of written instructions on how to do a thing. In this case on how to present and run an adventure for a group of players. They and the Guide, the person running the adventure, are known as “participants”, and each has a role to play in the adventure. In the case of the Guide very often a number of roles. The AG (Adventure Guide) also presents a setting where the adventure takes place, and most often that setting is placed in a world where people live and events occur.

In a sense an AG presents a fictional version of the world we know. So you could call it a “virtual reality”. While what happens during an adventure isn’t really happening, you can pretend that they are, and since they are, sort of, you can treat what is going on as actually occurring within the context of the adventure. In a sense what you have here is a sort of imaginary life and not a story in any sense.

For unlike a story in an adventure guide events are not set down. In fact they haven’t even been done yet and won’t be done until they get done. And what happens depends on what the participants decide to do, how they decide to do it, and chance. Nothing is guaranteed, success or failure.

This is how I see things, we’ll get into further detail as this work continues.

Forward

I first encountered Dangerous Journeys in 1992. After delaying after too damn long I’ve decided to at least make the basic mechanics available to a general audience, in case there are those out there who would want to use them in one of their adventure guides. This is not presented as a game in any sense of the word, for DJ (as I like to call it) is just to damn busy to be any sort of game. As I understand the term, a game is really supposed to be something simple and straightforward, presenting a limited milieu where the options are limited, the playing pieces are limited, and events don’t take long to play out.

This is the core system reference document for adventure guides. As such it is rather basic and each guide that uses it while most often present an expanded version of the mechanics. As an example the Abyss AG presents a far future world where Humanity is poised on the brink of interstellar space and the intention is to present a space opera for the players to take part in. In contrast Unhallowed gives you a guide to horror adventures, in a world where ancient maladies are rising from whatever they were forced down into way back in the day. While both have magick, and both use the basic magick mechanics, how they work specifically differs between them, and how their worlds treat the subject differs as well.

Now to get into some detail.

Introduction

Dangerous Journeys is a set of mechanics for what I call adventure guides. I call them adventure guides because that Is how I see them. They are guides to adventure where one person, called the Guide, guides a group of players through adventures set in a world where adventures tend to take place.

The DJ system was designed to mode, emulate that is, the worlds of story where adventures take place. Only instead of you telling a story set in that world, you are having an adventure while playing the role of a person living in that world. Whether it is the Urth of Changeling or the Ærth of Mythus it is his home, and how he fares in his life and adventures is up to the person playing him.

His success is not guaranteed. Neither is his failure, and it is quite likely that what happens as a result of his actions will surprise him and his fellows. An enemy may become a friend. A friend may become as enemy. A traitor may become the savior of his people, while a hero can be later named a traitor.

Those who participate in a DJ AG assume a role in an adventure. The Guide presenting the adventure to the player very often plays a number of roles. How player or Guide participates is up to him, though I do hope they at least participate willingly and with some flair.

As I’ve noted before the worlds of Dangerous Journeys are meant to model the worlds of adventure stories, from the tales of culture heroes of the past to modern day entertainment. Only here what happens to the participants depends on what they decide to do, and on how the fates turn out for them.

The Players

For the players their role is to participate. To take part. To use what skills, knowledge, and abilities they have, whatever they have, in support of the others in the party. It may not be much, it may not even be entirely relevant, but at least do something for you never know just how you might influence events.

The Guide

The role of the guide is to participate, to take part as much as the players do. In addition, he needs to present the world the players are adventuring in.

But one thing he should never do is make any attempt to present any sort of balance. For reality is quite unfair and how one fares depends a great deal on how he handles the unfairness. All participants are encouraged to take advantage of their advantages, and to use those advantages to take advantage of the others. For an adventure guide is not a level playing field and how one fares depends a great deal on what advantages he has and how he uses them.

In Summation

Dangerous Journeys as a system reference document presents the basic system for use in adventure guides. It presents a model of reality, or of how things could work if they could work. The mechanics presented here are not entirely realistic, nor can they be realistic for very often what is possible in a DJ AG is not possible in reality. What you do, what happens in a guide such as Changeling depends on you, what you decide to do, and fortune. You may succeed, you may fail. You may be named a fool or named a hero. It all depends on what you do, on how it turns out. And on how others react to it. Load your pack, strap on the tool belt, and get ready for whatever happens. Adventure awaits, but before you start first make sure you’ve visited the facilities.

Definition

Adventure: A series of uncomfortable events happening to some poor schmuck a long ways away.

Alan Kellogg, March 28th 2019

Our Need for Assurance

Filmmaker Errol Morris, once Kuhn’s grad student, accuses him of being a bad philosopher and bad person.

Source: Was Thomas Kuhn Evil? – Scientific American Blog Network

You get right down to it, we hate to be uncertain. The impression I get from the blog post linked to above is that Morris is none too fond of Kuhn telling him that he can’t be totally certain. I have bad news for Morris, you can’t be totally certain.

You get right down to it, we are limited. Limited in what we can know and limited in what we can understand. How we can see things has a profound effect on how we can know and understand, for we live at one level of perception, and when you go to a higher or lower level how you can perceive does change. There is a reality out there, but how we see it depends a great deal on how we can see it.

It is our flaw that we insist how we see things has to be the way to see it. In addition, how we see a thing depends on how we can see it, for our brains do not handle information as fast as we’d like. Speaking as an autistic, I get overwhelmed by what’s going on. At times things are just too much and I need some quiet time to get myself together. You get right down to it, everybody gets a bit overwhelmed and needs some time to get their shit together.

Oh, and Morris did insult Kuhn in that long ago meeting, with Kuhn over reacting to the insult.

So I wouldn’t say that Kuhn was evil, just mistaken. And that is was possible for him to learn and accept that. Just as it is possible for anybody to learn and accept that he was wrong, should they be willing to learn and accept.

That is how I see things. You?

On Being Wrong

Source: Home – Sasquatch Genome Project

In the link just above Dr. Ketchum presents her conclusion regarding the Sasquatch. Her conclusion is wrong, and that she is wrong is used by some of her critics to support their claim that she has to be wrong about the existence of Bigfoot. There is a term for this, the Fallacy Fallacy, in which the fact that one party is wrong about one thing means whatever else they say has to be wrong.

Now Ketchum doesn’t help her cause any through how she handles the data, in how she frames it. The presentation is crap and she assumes too much. Back when her findings were first released a skeptic had a look at them and found that the DNA found included a lot of gorilla DNA. This tells me that bigfoot has a common ancestor with the gorilla, which is what you’d expect given that both are great apes.

As I recall the skeptic concluded that Ketchum has to be wrong about the existence of the animal, based on her being wrong about the animal.This falls under the Fallacy Fallacy. In short, he came to a wrong conclusion because she made a wrong conclusion. In other words, he let his prejudice lead him astray.

He’s not alone, there are others who insist that something just can’t be all because another party made a mistake in one part of their conclusions. And very often it’s because the overall finding is something the skeptic didn’t learn in school. It comes down to this, we make mistakes because of our limitations. Limitations that mean we can’t know everything. We can at best know but a little of our world, and the rest will remain a mystery. But some just can’t accept that, for they are so insecure as to need absolute assurance.

And it’s not just in primatology. Physics is rife with it, with parties insisting on complications in their models, when the best way to understand what’s going on is to accept that it’s really quite simple, and that what we can see at present has layers beneath it. The foundation of the Quark is the String. Now what is the foundation of the String? For Strings as I’ve seen them presented are just too busy to be the foundation. Hadrons are badly focused blurs, Quarks are badly focused blurs. I suspect that Strings are badly focused blurs, and what they are made of are yet even more badly focused blurs. It isn’t until you get down to the bottom of things that you can an object that is simple and which constitutes the foundation of what all we know of.

And I suspect that this object is more a state spacetime can exist in, a state that in motion “disturbs” the spacetime around it that is in a different state. To add to this, it is my suspicion that there is a minimum size below which there can be nothing smaller. Which is to say, our existence is based on quanta below which we can not go. That is how I understand quanta, a part of spacetime and not in truth separated from it.

But anyway, whether we’re talking about zoology or physics, we need to accept that we can be wrong, and that we are wrong. I suspect that Strings are not the bottom of the pile, and I have concluded that the Sasquatch is a great ape living in North America. This last based on what evidence has been provided, and on what I know of the land of Beringia, which is at present partially flooded.

And that’s me being a contrarian.

A Consequence

Speaking of the Mythus Cosmology, it has occurred to me that one could look at the traditional 2d representation as being of the vertical, with a second schema showing the horizontal. And just to be different, instead of using the old 360° rose, I’ll be using the 400° rose from Star Fleet and the US Navy.

In addition, the horizontal plane will use the Egyptian compass, where North was going up the Nile, and South down it. Which means that when you’re facing North, West will be to your right and East to your left. 

Now with a Cosmos like Ærth’s you can do something you can’t with ours. In short, cheat. Because we can’t see our universe from the outside we can’t really tell where we are. With Ærth’s we can, and we can decide which is the vertical plane and which the horizontal. For my purposes I’m going to say that the location of Ærth’s galaxy is 394° vertically by 62° north by 376°. That should give you a picture of what it looks like.

I think that makes sense.

To My Surprise

Just got a call from my new Dr. and she’s says I am definitely anemic. We’ll be looking into that, but for now she wants me on red meat along with iron pills. The pills Medicaid will pay for, but the red meat means I need donations for the rest of this month. The donation button is in the sidebar, so if you are feeling generous go ahead and click on it.

Mythus Cosmology

Introduction

Gary based the cosmology for Mythus in large part on his old DnD cosmology. Which in large part he got from a proposal from Stephen R. Marsh. Now Gary did present his cosmology in a 2 dimensional form, but it has occured to me that in that existence is 3 dimensional, then the cosmology would be 3d as well. In addition, that the various planes would not necessarily be separated as represented in the illustration. So I’m now going to give you may version of affairs.

But First

In my scheme of things the reality we know of as the worlds of Dangerous Journeys covering modules such as Mythus and Changeling, plus whatever else is out there, is three dimensional. Or it can be described as having two axis, the vertical and the horizontal. The core is a sphere, with the outer planes constituting a shell.

The Core

At the heart of this cosmology is what we call the Prime Material. In all honesty, the Physical is but part of it, but it is the part most readily apparent to us. In total there are the Mental (Astral), Physical (Material), and Spiritual (Ætherial) planes. Each corresponds to an aspect of life. In addition there are the planes of Ærth, Air, Fire, and Water, but in worlds such as Changeling and Abyss these are understood to be more in the nature of natures than in actual things. To a Changeling Scholar or Abyss Scientist the terms used are Solid, Gaseous, Plasma, and Liquid respectively, and even on Ærth that is how they are seen as well.

The Outer Shell

Here is where it gets a bit more complicated. The outer planes are more abstract, more conceptual than is the core. By and large those below tend to be unpleasant places indeed, while those above seem rather nice. But keep in mind that in as much as good and evil are not seen as things, you can still find higher powers doing ill, while lower powers can be charitable.

The Positive and the Negative are found here, as are the Celestial and the Abyssal. Indeed, while connected to the Mental or the Spiritual the Astral and Ætherial planes extend here as well. (It’s also said that the Physical has it’s presence here, but most consider that wild speculation.)

Connections

Still doors and gates between the planes are known, and used more often then one might think. The Blessed and the Accursed are known to hold conferences on empty alternatives to Earth, with powers and potencies going slumming in cities such as Ys and New York. Though even the Accursed have banned visiting certain Ys locations, just too dangerous.

Finally

It must be noted that the worlds of Dangerous Journeys are not our worlds no matter what Mr. Grumbolt may have told you.For the DJ reality has one property our reality can’t. Namely that Magick can exist there, for the nature of spacetime is such as to allow the disturbance in spacetime that can be manipulated by those with the talent. But that’s a subject for later.

If you feel like doing a 3d model of the DJ Cosmology and adding to what I wrote here, go right ahead.

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3